Monday, February 16, 2009

Obama as Emma Woodhouse

I can't resist logging this amusing Jane Austen comparison from Sunday's Maureen Dowd column in The New York Times. The heart of the column is her fussing at Pres. Obama for his subtle jibes at Veep Joe Biden. Obama should show more respect, Dowd says.
Then the kicker: She compares Obama to Emma Woodhouse. Joe Biden is Miss Bates. Mr. Knightly is Dowd herself, I guess.
I'm not much of a fan of Emma -- Pride and Prejudice is infinitely superior, in my view. But the moment Dowd's referring to in Emma is my favorite of the book, and worth quoting here. It's Austen's fine-tuned psychological rendering at its best. The set-up is that Emma has made snide remark about how boring Miss Bates is. Then she tries to use the old excuse, "It was just a joke!" But Emma's suitor Mr. Knightly isn't having any of that, and calls her on it:

"Emma, I must once more speak to you as I have been used to do: a privilege rather endured than allowed, perhaps, but I must still use it. I cannot see you acting wrong, without a remonstrance. How could you be so unfeeling to Miss Bates? How could you be so insolent in your wit to a woman of her character, age, and situation?— Emma, I had not thought it possible."

Emma recollected, blushed, was sorry, but tried to laugh it off.

"Nay, how could I help saying what I did?—Nobody could have helped it. It was not so very bad. I dare say she did not understand me."

"I assure you she did. She felt your full meaning. She has talked of it since. I wish you could have heard how she talked of it—with what candour and generosity. I wish you could have heard her honouring your forbearance, in being able to pay her such attentions, as she was for ever receiving from yourself and your father, when her society must be so irksome."

"Oh!" cried Emma, "I know there is not a better creature in the world: but you must allow, that what is good and what is ridiculous are most unfortunately blended in her."

"They are blended," said he, "I acknowledge; and, were she prosperous, I could allow much for the occasional prevalence of the ridiculous over the good. Were she a woman of fortune, I would leave every harmless absurdity to take its chance, I would not quarrel with you for any liberties of manner. Were she your equal in situation—but, Emma, consider how far this is from being the case. She is poor; she has sunk from the comforts she was born to; and, if she live to old age, must probably sink more. Her situation should secure your compassion. It was badly done, indeed! You, whom she had known from an infant, whom she had seen grow up from a period when her notice was an honour, to have you now, in thoughtless spirits, and the pride of the moment, laugh at her, humble her—and before her niece, too—and before others, many of whom (certainly some,) would be entirely guided by your treatment of her.—This is not pleasant to you, Emma—and it is very far from pleasant to me; but I must, I will,—I will tell you truths while I can; satisfied with proving myself your friend by very faithful counsel, and trusting that you will some time or other do me greater justice than you can do now."

While they talked, they were advancing towards the carriage; it was ready; and, before she could speak again, he had handed her in. He had misinterpreted the feelings which had kept her face averted, and her tongue motionless. They were combined only of anger against herself, mortification, and deep concern. She had not been able to speak; and, on entering the carriage, sunk back for a moment overcome—then reproaching herself for having taken no leave, making no acknowledgment, parting in apparent sullenness, she looked out with voice and hand eager to shew a difference; but it was just too late. He had turned away, and the horses were in motion. She continued to look back, but in vain; and soon, with what appeared unusual speed, they were half way down the hill, and every thing left far behind. She was vexed beyond what could have been expressed—almost beyond what she could conceal. Never had she felt so agitated, mortified, grieved, at any circumstance in her life. She was most forcibly struck. The truth of this representation there was no denying. She felt it at her heart. How could she have been so brutal, so cruel to Miss Bates! How could she have exposed herself to such ill opinion in any one she valued! And how suffer him to leave her without saying one word of gratitude, of concurrence, of common kindness!

Time did not compose her. As she reflected more, she seemed but to feel it more. She never had been so depressed. Happily it was not necessary to speak. There was only Harriet, who seemed not in spirits herself, fagged, and very willing to be silent; and Emma felt the tears running down her cheeks almost all the way home, without being at any trouble to check them, extraordinary as they were.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

On my bedside table

I was talking with a friend lately outlining my reading list for the next few months. Anyway, here's what I have read in what order.
  • The Book of Chameleons, by José Eduardo Agualusa: This is for my reader's advisory class. The assignment was to pick a contemporary work of fiction in translation, in this case, from the Portuguese. This is an avant-garde murder mystery set in Africa and narrated by a lizard! I started reading it this morning, and it's beautifully written and already haunting me. In tone and mood, it reminds me just a bit of The Sea by John Banville. (Are you reading this, JJ?)
  • A Fraction of the Whole by Steve Tolz: Speaking of JJ, this is her book pick for our next book group meeting. It's a zany literary-adventure novel from Australia; The Wall Street Journal compared it to my much beloved A Confederacy of Dunces. Because I'm a hard-working blogger, I dug up the exact quote from the WSJ: "Mr. Toltz's merry chaos -- a mix of metaphysical inquiry, ribald jokes, freakish occurrences and verbal dynamite booming across the page -- deserves a place next to 'A Confederacy of Dunces' in a category that might be called the undergraduate ecstatic." The reviewer then calls it "Voltaire meets Vonnegut." OK, so you get the idea. It is, so far, snicker-out-loud funny. And it's loooooooooong ... some reviewers say too long. 
  • I have two books that I may review. I won't name them here but one is about post-Katrina New Orleans and the other is a first novel. 
  • Finally, I made a deal with my mom. Either I read The Brothers Karamazov by her birthday or I give her my spanking new, hardcover, fabulous new translation copy of the book. I don't want to do that! Her birthday is May 4. Can I make it? Only time will tell!